<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Snipe Hunting in the NDTX &#187; Sidney A. Fitzwater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/category/judges/district-judge/sidney-a-fitzwater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texas-ip.com</link>
	<description>Intellectual Property Litigation in the Northern District of Texas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Panel of N.D. Tex. Judges to Provide Practice Tips for Federal Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2011/06/panel-of-nd-tex-judges-to-provide-practice-tips-for-federal-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2011/06/panel-of-nd-tex-judges-to-provide-practice-tips-for-federal-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Kubasta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[District Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistrate Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam A. Lindsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidney A. Fitzwater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texas-ip.com/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday, June 23, 2011, from noon to 1:30 pm, a panel of Northern District of Texas federal judges will discuss practice tips and pitfalls to avoid when handling federal cases.  This free CLE event will be held at the Belo Mansion (2101 Ross Avenue) and is open to all attorneys. The panel of ND [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, June 23, 2011, from noon to 1:30 pm, a panel of Northern District of Texas federal judges will discuss practice tips and pitfalls to avoid when handling federal cases.  This free CLE event will be held at the Belo Mansion (2101 Ross Avenue) and is open to all attorneys.</p>
<p>The panel of ND Tex judges will include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Chief District Judge Sidney Fitzwater (facilitator)</li>
<li>District Judge Sam Lindsay</li>
<li>District Judge Jane Boyle</li>
<li>Chief Bankruptcy Judge Barbara Houser</li>
<li>Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition to the above, other judges and court officials will be in attendance.  The event, cosponsored by the Federal Bar Association and the Dallas Bar Association Judiciary Committee, is free except for the cost of lunch and parking.</p>
<br/><p><a href="/index.php/email/?id=780" rel="nofollow" title="Email this article to your associates." style="font-weight: bold;"><img src="http://www.texas-ip.com/wp-content/plugins/emailthis/email.gif" style="border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" alt="Email this post"> Email this original Klemchuk Kubasta LLP article to your associates.</a></p><p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://www.texas-ip.com">Snipe Hunting in the NDTX</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2011/06/panel-of-nd-tex-judges-to-provide-practice-tips-for-federal-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chief Judge Fitzwater Speaks on the Legacy of John Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2011/05/chief-judge-fitzwater-speaks-on-the-legacy-of-john-adams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2011/05/chief-judge-fitzwater-speaks-on-the-legacy-of-john-adams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 16:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirby Drake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[District Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidney A. Fitzwater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texas-ip.com/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dallas Bar Association (DBA) held its annual Law Day Luncheon on May 13, 2011. Law Day is a celebration of the U.S. justice system that has been held every May since 1958. This year’s Law Day theme was “The Legacy of John Adams: From Boston to Guantanamo,” and the DBA was honored to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dallas Bar Association (DBA) held its annual Law Day Luncheon on May 13, 2011. Law Day is a celebration of the U.S. justice system that has been held every May since 1958.  This year’s Law Day theme was “The Legacy of John Adams: From Boston to Guantanamo,” and the DBA was honored to have Chief Judge Sidney Fitzwater of the Northern District of Texas as its keynote speaker.</p>
<p>Judge Fitzwater spoke on the impact of John Adams’ roles of political activist, philosopher, lawyer and president on the creation of the American government and the protection of American society.  He discussed Adams’ unpopular defense of a British officer and soldiers allegedly responsible for civilian deaths in the notorious “Boston Massacre.”  He focused on how Adams’ efforts demonstrate adherence to the rule of law and defense of the rights of the accused, even in cases where the clients and the matters may be unpopular and/or controversial.</p>
<p>Judge Fitzwater provided several examples of lawyers defending unpopular causes since Adams’ time, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>The 1846 “insanity” defense of William Freeman by William Seward, later Lincoln&#8217;s Secretary of State; Samuel Leibowitz’s defense of nine black Alabama teenagers, the Scottsboro Boys, accused of rape in the 1930s;</li>
<li>The representation of Terry Nichols in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing case; and</li>
<li>Contemporary efforts by lawyers to represent Guantanamo detainees in the global war on terrorism.</li>
</ul>
<p>Judge Fitzwater concluded by noting that the law has certainly evolved since Adams’ time, but the principles on which citizens derive and exercise their rights remain the same.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<br/><p><a href="/index.php/email/?id=763" rel="nofollow" title="Email this article to your associates." style="font-weight: bold;"><img src="http://www.texas-ip.com/wp-content/plugins/emailthis/email.gif" style="border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" alt="Email this post"> Email this original Klemchuk Kubasta LLP article to your associates.</a></p><p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://www.texas-ip.com">Snipe Hunting in the NDTX</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2011/05/chief-judge-fitzwater-speaks-on-the-legacy-of-john-adams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Fitzwater Finds Patent Complaint Sufficient, Denies Motion to Dismiss</title>
		<link>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2011/04/judge-fitzwater-finds-patent-complaint-sufficient-denies-motion-to-dismiss/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2011/04/judge-fitzwater-finds-patent-complaint-sufficient-denies-motion-to-dismiss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 03:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Bandy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motion to Dismiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleading Requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidney A. Fitzwater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texas-ip.com/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In B-50.com, LLC v. Infosync Services, LLC, 2011 U.S. Dist. Lexis 29102 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2011), Plaintiff B-50.com filed an amended complaint alleging inducement of patent infringement and contributory patent infringement by Defendant Infosync Services.  Judge Fitzwater recently denied Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.  Specifically, because the amended complaint sets forth factual recitations as opposed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #888888">In <strong><em>B-50.com, LLC v. Infosync Services, LLC</em></strong>, 2011 U.S. Dist.  Lexis 29102 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2011), Plaintiff B-50.com filed an  amended complaint alleging inducement of patent infringement and  contributory patent infringement by Defendant Infosync Services.   Judge  Fitzwater recently denied Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.    Specifically, because the amended complaint sets forth factual  recitations as opposed to legal conclusions, Judge Fitzwater held that  the amended complaint includes allegations sufficient to bring claims  for direct infringement, inducement of infringement, and contributory  infringement.   The Court therefore concluded that the amended complaint  is sufficient to state a claim that is plausible on its face.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #888888">Judge Fitzwater’s denial of the motion to dismiss found that the  claims of direct and indirect infringement are supported by the  following pertinent facts alleged in the amended complaint:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #888888"><strong>Direct Infringement</strong> – </span>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #888888">Defendant produces and sells using an infringing method (the Court noted the method was fully described in the complaint);</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #888888">Defendant either uses or directs, controls, or instructs a third party who uses every element of the infringing method;</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #888888">Defendant describes and advertises the accused method on its website; and</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #888888">Defendant has actual knowledge of the patent at issue.</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #888888"><strong>Inducement of Infringement</strong> – </span>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #888888">Defendant uses or sells methods claimed in the patent at issue in  the accused application or directs or controls third parties who perform  the claimed method; and</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #888888">Defendant has actual knowledge of the patent at issue and continued to sell its infringing application willfully.</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #888888"><strong>Contributory Infringement</strong> – </span>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #888888">Defendant sells a product, method, or system that is a component designed for use in the infringing manner; and</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #888888">Defendant has sold software tools and instructions to aid in the use of the application.</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<br/><p><a href="/index.php/email/?id=736" rel="nofollow" title="Email this article to your associates." style="font-weight: bold;"><img src="http://www.texas-ip.com/wp-content/plugins/emailthis/email.gif" style="border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" alt="Email this post"> Email this original Klemchuk Kubasta LLP article to your associates.</a></p><p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://www.texas-ip.com">Snipe Hunting in the NDTX</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2011/04/judge-fitzwater-finds-patent-complaint-sufficient-denies-motion-to-dismiss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>N.D. Texas Amends Local Civil Rules &#8211; Notice of Related Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2010/08/northern-district-of-texas-amends-local-civil-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2010/08/northern-district-of-texas-amends-local-civil-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Kubasta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local Rules of Northern District of Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pleading Requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rules of Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidney A. Fitzwater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texas-ip.com/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Effective September 1, 2010, new Local Rule 3.3 and amended Local Rule 81.1 will take effect in the Northern District of Texas.  Both of these Local Rules address a plaintiff’s obligation to provide notice of &#8220;related cases&#8221; when filing a new complaint in the Northern District of Texas.  This amendment is made pursuant to Special [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Effective September 1, 2010, new Local Rule 3.3 and amended Local Rule 81.1 will take effect in the Northern District of Texas.   Both of these Local Rules address a plaintiff’s obligation to provide notice of &#8220;related cases&#8221; when filing a new complaint in the Northern District of Texas.   This amendment is made pursuant to <a title="Special Order No. 2-71 re: Notice of Related Cases" href="http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/pdf/sp_order2/2-74.pdf" target="_blank">Special Order No. 2-74 entered by Chief Judge Sidney Fitzwater on March 10, 2010</a>.</p>
<p><a title="Special Order No. 2-71 re: Notice of Related Cases" href="http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/pdf/sp_order2/2-74.pdf" target="_blank">New Local Rule 3.3(a)</a> sets forth the basic notice requirements when filing a complaint (or removing a civil action from state court) that has a &#8220;related case.&#8221;   Local Rule 3.3(b) defines what constitutes a &#8220;related case.&#8221;   Local Rule 3.3(c) establishes that a failure to provide notice of a &#8220;related case&#8221; constitutes a certification by the plaintiff (or removing party) that no &#8220;related cases&#8221; exist.</p>
<p>Local Rule 81.1 sets forth the required form of documents to be filed upon removal of a civil action from state court.   Specifically, <a title="Special Order No. 2-71 re: Notice of Related Cases" href="http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/pdf/sp_order2/2-74.pdf" target="_blank">Local Rule 81.1(a)(3)</a> has been amended by inserting a new requirement – “if there is a ‘related case,’ as defined by LR 3.3(b)(3) or (b)(4), a notice of related case that complies with LR 3.3(a)” must be filed with the clerk when removing a civil action from state court.</p>
<br/><p><a href="/index.php/email/?id=501" rel="nofollow" title="Email this article to your associates." style="font-weight: bold;"><img src="http://www.texas-ip.com/wp-content/plugins/emailthis/email.gif" style="border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" alt="Email this post"> Email this original Klemchuk Kubasta LLP article to your associates.</a></p><p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://www.texas-ip.com">Snipe Hunting in the NDTX</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.texas-ip.com/index.php/2010/08/northern-district-of-texas-amends-local-civil-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

